Skip to main content
    Decolonizing Love - Millie and Nick
    One of the world's largest polyamory education platforms

    DECOLONIZEYour Love

    Relationship education that decolonizes how we love. Unlearn the colonial scripts of monogamy, hierarchy, and domination to navigate ethical non-monogamy, intentional community, and the relationships you choose.

    Community
    580K+
    Workshops
    30+
    Press Features
    20+

    Love is political.

    Read the Manifesto

    Most relationship advice ignores power, race, and colonial norms. We don't. Relationships are shaped by systems. We are here to dismantle them.

    01

    Love Is Abundant

    Love does not need exclusivity to be real. Connection is not scarce. Connection is limitless.

    02

    Decolonize the Default

    Monogamy as the only model is a colonial inheritance, not human nature. We reclaim the diversity of love.

    03

    Accountability Over Purity

    We create brave spaces rooted in accountability, not perfection. Growth happens through compassion and curiosity, not judgment.

    04

    Define Love on Your Terms

    Reject shame. Embrace the full spectrum of connection. Your relationships belong to you.

    Latest Thoughts

    Why Overprotecting Her From Abusive Poly Men Isn’t Protecting Her
    Polyamory
    Relationships
    Identity & Equality

    Why Overprotecting Her From Abusive Poly Men Isn’t Protecting Her

    A heterosexual couple with a young child open their relationship. Nothing is wrong between them. The communication is strong, the sex is good, and both spent months reading and reflecting before deciding together. He calls himself a feminist and means it. And still, every time she leaves for a date with another man, something in him locks up. Millie is careful about what this is not. It is not jealousy, and it is not envy. He does not want her to stop dating and he does not want a one penis policy. What he feels is fear on her behalf: he does not trust men, and he is afraid one of them will hurt her. She has watched the same thing surface in more than one man she has coached, and she has seen it inside her own polycule, where a partner sat in agony every time one of his other partners went out with someone new because he had decided she was too sheltered to spot danger. The essay takes that fear seriously before taking it apart, because protectiveness aimed at a grown woman does something to her autonomy whatever the intention behind it. What Millie told that partner, and what she tells clients when this shows up, is behind the paywall.

    Read more →
    Kids Aren’t a Hierarchy: How to Parent as an Egalitarian Polyamorist
    Polyamory
    Relationships

    Kids Aren’t a Hierarchy: How to Parent as an Egalitarian Polyamorist

    Every time Millie posts about hierarchical polyamory being unethical, some version of the same comment arrives: my children will of course take priority, which is why egalitarian polyamory could never work for me. This essay argues that the objection rests on a category error, confusing immediate care needs with relational hierarchy. Parents picture a toddler's basic needs going on a voting ballot next to somebody's second date night. What egalitarian polyamory actually asks is different. When a three year old spikes a fever you cancel date night because you are an adult looking after a dependent human, not because the child occupies the top of a feudal pyramid. That is dependency, not hierarchy. Couple privilege is the structural advantage society hands an established couple through legal marriage, tax breaks, benefits plans, hospital recognition and holiday packages priced for two. Relational hierarchy is the choice to take that advantage and use it as power over someone else's relationship, and children get used as an emotional shield for exactly that. The full post, for paid subscribers, draws on evolutionary anthropology and studies of real egalitarian polyamorous families to argue that raising a family does not require ranking your partners.

    Read more →
    Relationship Anarchy: Is The Polyamory Community Where Revolutionary Anarchist Politics Went to Die?
    Polyamory
    Politics
    Decolonization

    Relationship Anarchy: Is The Polyamory Community Where Revolutionary Anarchist Politics Went to Die?

    This starts as a small annoyance and turns into an argument. Hunting for anarchism podcasts while organizing a relationship anarchy conference, the writer kept finding relationship anarchy by polyamorists and almost nothing about anarchism itself. The essay is careful about what it isn't accusing anyone of. Plenty of relationship anarchists genuinely refuse to rank romantic partners above friends or chosen family. The problem is that for many of them the critique of hierarchy stops at their own relationships and never reaches the workplace, the police, the prison, or the state. The distinction comes down to two sentences that sound alike and aren't. 'I choose not to organize my relationships hierarchically' is a personal practice. 'Hierarchy is domination and should be challenged wherever it appears' is anarchist politics. The slide from the second to the first gets read here as a very old Western habit: the Enlightenment announcing universal equality while European empires expanded, the American Revolution declaring all people equal while keeping slavery legal. Then the history goes back into the word. Proudhon claiming the label in 1840, when anarchy still meant chaos to almost everyone. The Haymarket anarchists hanged after the 1886 bombing in Chicago. The Spanish Revolution of 1936, crushed by Franco and then by Stalinists in Barcelona. People were executed over this, which is why borrowing the vocabulary while defending hierarchy reads as grotesque. It doesn't end by telling anyone to drop the term. Andie Nordgren, who co-coined relationship anarchy, said the deliberately less political framing was meant as a doorway into anarchism. The verdict here is that the door got built and mostly nobody walked through. Emma Goldman does the closing work: after watching Bolshevik Russia turn its violence on anarchists too, she decided that a revolution leaving domination intact in our closest relationships isn't one. Hence the conference, billed pointedly as the first relationship anarchy conference with actual anarchist speakers.

    Read more →

    Don't Miss What's Next

    New workshops, product drops, events, and exclusive discounts, delivered to your inbox before anyone else.

    No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.

    We use cookies to enhance your experience, analyze traffic, and serve relevant content.