Skip to main content
    Decolonizing Love - Millie and Nick
    One of the world's largest polyamory education platforms

    DECOLONIZEYour Love

    Relationship education that decolonizes how we love. Unlearn the colonial scripts of monogamy, hierarchy, and domination to navigate ethical non-monogamy, intentional community, and the relationships you choose.

    Community
    580K+
    Workshops
    30+
    Press Features
    20+

    Love is political.

    Read the Manifesto

    Most relationship advice ignores power, race, and colonial norms. We don't. Relationships are shaped by systems. We are here to dismantle them.

    01

    Love Is Abundant

    Love does not need exclusivity to be real. Connection is not scarce. Connection is limitless.

    02

    Decolonize the Default

    Monogamy as the only model is a colonial inheritance, not human nature. We reclaim the diversity of love.

    03

    Accountability Over Purity

    We create brave spaces rooted in accountability, not perfection. Growth happens through compassion and curiosity, not judgment.

    04

    Define Love on Your Terms

    Reject shame. Embrace the full spectrum of connection. Your relationships belong to you.

    Latest Thoughts

    Relationship Anarchy: Is The Polyamory Community Where Revolutionary Anarchist Politics Went to Die?
    Polyamory
    Politics
    Decolonization

    Relationship Anarchy: Is The Polyamory Community Where Revolutionary Anarchist Politics Went to Die?

    This starts as a small annoyance and turns into an argument. Hunting for anarchism podcasts while organizing a relationship anarchy conference, the writer kept finding relationship anarchy by polyamorists and almost nothing about anarchism itself. The essay is careful about what it isn't accusing anyone of. Plenty of relationship anarchists genuinely refuse to rank romantic partners above friends or chosen family. The problem is that for many of them the critique of hierarchy stops at their own relationships and never reaches the workplace, the police, the prison, or the state. The distinction comes down to two sentences that sound alike and aren't. 'I choose not to organize my relationships hierarchically' is a personal practice. 'Hierarchy is domination and should be challenged wherever it appears' is anarchist politics. The slide from the second to the first gets read here as a very old Western habit: the Enlightenment announcing universal equality while European empires expanded, the American Revolution declaring all people equal while keeping slavery legal. Then the history goes back into the word. Proudhon claiming the label in 1840, when anarchy still meant chaos to almost everyone. The Haymarket anarchists hanged after the 1886 bombing in Chicago. The Spanish Revolution of 1936, crushed by Franco and then by Stalinists in Barcelona. People were executed over this, which is why borrowing the vocabulary while defending hierarchy reads as grotesque. It doesn't end by telling anyone to drop the term. Andie Nordgren, who co-coined relationship anarchy, said the deliberately less political framing was meant as a doorway into anarchism. The verdict here is that the door got built and mostly nobody walked through. Emma Goldman does the closing work: after watching Bolshevik Russia turn its violence on anarchists too, she decided that a revolution leaving domination intact in our closest relationships isn't one. Hence the conference, billed pointedly as the first relationship anarchy conference with actual anarchist speakers.

    Read more →
    How to Know What Your Values Are in Polyamory
    Polyamory
    Relationships

    How to Know What Your Values Are in Polyamory

    Sixteen years ago, on a fourth date in Montréal, two 24-year-olds wandered into an Indigo bookstore, found a copy of 1,000 Questions to Ask Before You Marry Someone, and spent four hours in the cafe working through it. Money habits. Gender roles. Politics. Where they wanted to live. What a good life at sixty looked like. They came out of the afternoon figuring they were about 80% compatible. Millie knows how that sounds, clinical and unromantic, the stuff of engineers and lawyers rather than artists and lovers. But both of them had just left long relationships that ended over values instead of feeling: her four year engagement to a man who wanted her living with his parents in a grey English town as a traditional wife, and Nick's years with a devout Catholic while he was adamantly atheist. That afternoon became the reference point for every hard conversation since. When they opened the relationship eighteen months later and Nick wanted hierarchical polyamory, it never turned into a debate about polyamory. They went back to what they had already worked out in the bookstore: self-determination, dignity, equal moral consideration for everyone involved. Egalitarian polyamory was simply what those commitments produced once you followed them through. They didn't pick a style and defend it. They let the values decide. The rest is about how rarely anyone does this before the damage is done. She describes listening to people recount promising first dates, the ones with work and hobbies and attachment style and real chemistry and good sex, every textbook green flag in place, and not one word about values. What she hears underneath is the survival horror saxophone, the internet's favorite sound for a monster getting closer. The actual list of values worth asking about sits behind the paywall. The setup on its own is enough to ruin a few of your own first dates in hindsight.

    Read more →
    This is How You Dismantle Couple Privilege
    Polyamory
    Relationships
    Identity & Equality

    This is How You Dismantle Couple Privilege

    You'll hear the argument all over polyamory discourse: hierarchies in relationships are natural and inevitable, so anyone claiming to practice egalitarian polyamory is kidding themselves. This essay takes that apart by showing the word hierarchy is doing two entirely different jobs in it. Social hierarchy is structural, something the world does to you whether you consent or not. Relational hierarchy is a decision you make about how to treat your partners. Couple privilege is the structural kind. Legal marriage, tax breaks, employer benefits, automatic recognition at hospitals, holiday packages priced for two: society hands these to an established couple whether they ask for them or not, and additional partners in a polycule receive none of it. Relational hierarchy is the choice to take that unearned advantage and wield it as power over someone else's relationship. Veto power, a hinge defaulting to a spouse's wants over another partner's needs, agreements made about a relationship by someone who isn't even in it. The move that makes it click is the analogy to white privilege and male privilege. Having privilege doesn't make you an oppressor, but it does create responsibility. We have shelves of books on how white people can be allies and how men can build healthier masculinity, and almost nothing on how couples can dismantle the privilege they hold inside their own polycules. The fourteen concrete practices this essay offers sit behind the paywall, ranked from the easiest internal shifts to the hardest structural ones.

    Read more →

    Don't Miss What's Next

    New workshops, product drops, events, and exclusive discounts, delivered to your inbox before anyone else.

    No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.

    We use cookies to enhance your experience, analyze traffic, and serve relevant content.